Paul Mackerras wrote: > Scott Wood writes: > >> +_GLOBAL(mpc6xx_enter_sleep) > > The name is slightly unfortunate as powerbooks also use 6xx-family > processors but enter sleep in a quite different manner, because they > exit sleep with a reset. Can you think of a better name, that gives a > hint that this is the one to use if we are exiting sleep with an > interrupt rather than a reset?
The nomenclature I've been using on 83xx is to call it deep sleep if you exit with a reset, but if powerbooks can only do deep sleep, and it's already been called plain old "sleep", then I guess something else is warranted. mpc6xx_enter_coreonly_sleep? mpc6xx_enter_light_sleep? mpc6xx_enter_standby? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
