Paul Mackerras wrote:
> It might be better to use hard_irq_disable rather than
> local_irq_disable here, since I think we will need that on 64-bit (and
> on 32-bit if we ever do lazy irq disabling there).
OK.
>> +/* Overrides the weak version in kernel/power/main.c */
>> +void arch_suspend_disable_irqs(void)
>> +{
>> + if (ppc_md.suspend_disable_irqs)
>> + ppc_md.suspend_disable_irqs();
>> + else
>> + generic_suspend_disable_irqs();
>
> Any particular reason why we need a ppc_md hook here? Do we expect
> some platform to need to do something different?
Not that I know the details of, but others requested it.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
