Kumar Gala wrote: > On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote: >> Any particular reason to special-case it, when we already need code to >> do it the other way for every other fsl soc? > > If you suggest a sane way of getting the value let me know. The mpc8xx > doesn't appear to have what I would call 'soc' level registers like > 83xx/85xx/86xx does. How do you propose we determine the immrbase?
What exactly do you mean by "soc"-level registers? I propose we do it by defining the first (and ideally only, but that's another argument) entry in ranges as the immr, and getting rid of /soc/reg. >> And why is 82xx-pq2 special? Wouldn't you need this on 83xx, 85xx, >> and 86xx as well? > > The range will cover the whole immr space on 83xx/85xx/86xx. And why can't it do that on 82xx? > 82xx-pq2 is special in that its soc regs are in the middle of the immr > address map. The /soc node is misnamed; it should really be /immr. Why do we need these particular registers to be in /soc/reg rather than a subnode? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
