On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:31:07PM +0100, Matt Sealey wrote:
>
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:09:22PM +0100, Matt Sealey wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> The Solaris PPC code drop included most of these functions for 32-bit ops
> >> on
> >> 32-bit PPC architectures but the 64-bit operations are not present. What I
> >> a not clear on is the operation of lwarx and stwcx. and if they will work
> >> if
> >> you are doing operations on two words at a time.
> >
> > No. There is a single reservation for a single word.
>
> This is what I gathered from the programming environments manual at least.
>
> > the 64 bit operations inside a spinlock on PPC32, and then select the
> > number /location of spinlock(s) based on your needs, from one global
> > per machine to one per 64 bit variable if you find excessive contention.
>
> Okay that makes sense, but it would have to be a super global big lock,
> I don't think the code is there in ZFS to give every 64-bit variable it's
> own dedicated spinlock (kind of an overhaul) and I'm trying to be fast..
These aren't the only two options. You could use a hashed array of
locks, based on the address where you're doing the atomic operation.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
