On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:21:15AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:34:09AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Hrm.. I think the --binary option at least should be removed, and
> > subsumed into the platform id - all other binary formats are selected
> > by the platform name at present.
> > 
> > And I think it's probably best to do that for --fixed-entry as well,
> > although it's a bit less clear there.
> 
> I'm not particularly fond of having huge platform switch blocks in the
> wrapper script -- if it can be reasonably parameterized, why not do so?

Because I'd prefer to keep as much of the per-platform details (what
binary format is needed and so forth) concentrated in wrapper, rather
than scattered across multiple places.  I agree we're not really doing
it the best way - I had some ideas for a nicer way to rewrite wrapper,
but I haven't had a chance to implement it yet.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to