On Aug 30, 2007, at 12:56 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 05:41:17PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> NACK. >> >> I don't want pq2 to be the only platform that has the PCI bus >> separate from the PCI controller. > > Could you articulate the reasons why you'd rather have a mishmash > of crap > in the soc node's ranges property?
It don't feel its a mishmash of crap its just how things are defined. Maybe the SOC node was a mistake, but I think we are past the point of return on that. Having one platform's device tree be different just creates confusion to our customers. While there isn't anything technically wrong with what your proposing it will cause support issues down the line which I want to avoid. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
