From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:45:41 -0500
> In the end, I just let it be, and let the system work as a > busy-beaver, with the high interrupt rate. Is this a wise thing to > do? The tradeoff is always going to be latency vs. throughput. A sane default should defer enough to catch multiple packets coming in at something close to line rate, but not so much that latency unduly suffers. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
