Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>>-#define W8(_p, _m, _v)       __fcc_out8(&(_p)->_m, (_v))
>>-#define R8(_p, _m)   __fcc_in8(&(_p)->_m)
>>+#define W8(_p, _m, _v)       out_8(&(_p)->_m, (_v))
>>+#define R8(_p, _m)   in_8(&(_p)->_m)
>> #define S8(_p, _m, _v)       W8(_p, _m, R8(_p, _m) | (_v))
>> #define C8(_p, _m, _v)       W8(_p, _m, R8(_p, _m) & ~(_v))
>> 
>>@@ -290,7 +281,7 @@ static void restart(struct net_device *dev)
>> 
>>      /* clear everything (slow & steady does it) */
>>      for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*ep); i++)
>>-             __fcc_out8((char *)ep + i, 0);
>>+             out_8((char *)ep + i, 0);
>> 
> 
> Perhaps W8() here, to keep consistency?

W8 expects a struct pointer and member, which we don't have here.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to