On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:40:01PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> >>This allows booting on legacy, non-device-tree aware versions of
> >>U-boot.
> >
> >
> > Is this really sufficient for all 8xx platforms?
>
> It should be enough for all u-boot-based 8xx boards, barring some u-boot
> which needs special fixups (as is done in cuboot-pq2.c). If such a need
> arises, they can be added to cuboot-8xx.c (if they're generic enough to
> work on all boards, even if not actually needed) or to a board-specific
> platform file (which can coexist just fine with the generic 8xx
> one).
Ok. Presumably our bd_t won't exactly line up for all 8xx (since it
varies from platform to platform, yes?) - but I gather the only bits
we use do match up. That's probably worth a comment, so that someone
doesn't try using some later bd_t field which is only in the right
place for some 8xx systems.
Otherwise,
Acked-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
