On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:15:44PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Hrm... Freescale is using these 'fsl,device-id' properties, I'm
> > guessing they're basically the same thing as the 'cell-index' used in
> > the EMAC binding.
> >
> > We should co-ordinate better on this, if it's to become a
> > convention...
>
> That means we shouldn't coordinate on this, right?
Heh. Either one is kind of ugly, I'll grant you.
But, many SoCs do have a notion of device "number", which is relevant
for programming other general control registers in places. We need to
encode it somehow, and it would be good to have a consistent way of
doing it.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
