>> + - compatible : should contain the specific model of flash >> chip(s) used >> + followed by either "cfi-flash" or "jedec-flash" > > Duh, have nearly forgotten to complain about "-flash" suffix. > Isn't it superfluous?
No, it describes what kind of thing this is. "cfi" and "jedec" don't say much: "cfi" could equally well mean the "cute friendly imp", and who knows what kind of JEDEC-interface device this is supposed to indicate. "cfi-flash" and "jedec-flash" on the other hand are sufficiently clear, even if they aren't completely specific; this is a very common device so some leeway is in order. Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
