>>> Yeah, better names please -- if possible, something that someone >>> without knowledge of this SoC will understand what it is. >> >> I think the names are probably ok - I'm assuming they're in keeping >> with the convention I've used of using the same names / abbreviations >> as in the CPU user manual. I'm asking just for my own information, >> although a comment might not be a bad idea.
Fine with me -- I personally prefer "system-device-controller" and "clock-power-controller" or similar, but that is mostly a matter of taste. As long as it's human readable it's fine. > - Required properties: > + - compatible : should contain the specific model of flash > chip(s) used "if known". > + followed by either "cfi-flash" or "jedec-flash" > + Flash partitions > + - reg : > + - read-only : (optional) I'll hold off commenting on this until you've finish writing it, you probably know my opinion about it anyway :-) One thing though -- what _exactly_ does "read-only" signify? Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
