> Here's some anecdotal evidence :) > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-May/035758.html
Right, but then we went on to say that we probably want to use multiple vectors to separate out multiple HCA ports rather than send/sreceive on the same port. And the current IPoIB implementation of having that second CQ seems suboptimal anyway, since it seems to leave us susceptible to the interrupt overload that NAPI was supposed to solve. At a higher level, I'm left wondering why nobody talked about multiple EQs during the last months of the 2.6.22 process and now all of a sudden it becomes urgent in the last few days of the 2.6.23 merge window. That's not really how I like to merge features.... - R. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
