Hm, it seems that, after all, cpm_uart works fine without any board specific code whatsoever. Sorry about the fuss. My mistake
Regards Alex On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:55:30 +0300, Alexandros Kostopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering, since arch/powerpc is now based on device trees, > shouldn't the cpm_uart driver (or at least a branch of it for > arch/powerpc) be changed to use of_platform_bus_type instead of > platform_bus_type? In my opinion, cpm_uart driver should take all its > configuration (uart address base, ints etc) from dts (via the > of_platform code) without any intervention from board specific code. In > any case, given the current situation, how can I pass cpm_uart the > address/irq of the uarts? by hardcoding it in my board specific code? > mpc82xx_ads.c doesn't seem to have such code, and I was wondering how > SCC uarts work in this platform? Who initializes them? > > thank you > > Alex _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
