Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I would personally be inclined to define that whatever spec we come up > with always require #address-cells/#size-cells for any node that can > have either device children or interrupt children, and ban default > values alltogether.
When is #size-cells used in the interrupt tree at all? And given the odd behavior of using an interrupt map in an interrupt parent that is not the device parent (you're potentially using keys from different domains that could clash, be a different sizes, etc), if we make any changes in that regard, I'd forbid interrupt maps in interrupt controllers with no device children, and thus #address-cells has no meaning there. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
