On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 02:09 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > Is it actually feasible to get to a point where > > you can build a kernel that boots on both > > 40x and 44x, or is it just too different? > > I'm guessing its too different since 40x probably has a real mode and > 44x doesnt.
Among other things. > However, I agree we should go ahead and rename 4xx to 40x at this > point in arch/powerpc. Yeah. See my response to Arnd about getting a git tree in place to do it. RSN :) josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
