>> I may be missing the obvious, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of >> non-executable mappings? > > The hardware in question doesn't support non-executable mappings;
Not on a per-page basis, anyway. > otherwise, it'd never have worked in the first place. Note that > this is > only allowed on 32-bit, non-book-E. > > There isn't much value in enforcing non-exec mappings only if it > happens > to be the first fault on a given page. Yeah. Giving the warning is a good thing though. Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
