Andi Kleen wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> For one thing, it looks like we're returning the wrong thing (EINVAL
>> rather than ENOTTY) across the board. This was unfortunately a common
>> misunderstanding with non-tty-related ioctls in the early days of Linux.
>
> ENOTTY is so excessively misnamed that it is actually surprising
> anybody ever got that "right" (for very small values of right i guess)
>
No argument there.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
