On Thursday 07 April 2011 12:39 PM, jtd wrote: > On Wednesday 06 April 2011 22:44:35 H.S.Rai wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:09 AM, jtd<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 05 April 2011 07:14:15 H.S.Rai wrote: >>> >>> Revert back with the results of the test. The fact that minicom >>> reports "ring" shows that the ring detect is ok. >> The EPBAX we are having support "Group 4" protocol, while efax >> support "Group 3". >> >> I guess Hylafax do support Group 4: >> >> http://www.hylafax.org/man/4.4.4/hylafax-info.4f.html >> >> Tag, Type, Description >> supports2DEncoding, boolean,accepts Group 3 2D encoding >> supportsMMR, boolean, accepts Group 4 encoding >> >> What is the opinion of experts? Am I right? > Fax machines wil negotiate to the highest acceptable capability. Thus > GIV implies GIII capability. Besides ring has nothing to do with > this. G IV provides for special encoding and error recovery. > The OP should ask the EPABX guy if he can alter the ring type or increase ringer voltage.
-- As a proper list etiquette..... Please trim your replies. Avoid cross posting to other lists. Post your replies below the relevant original text, leaving a line space. Do not re-use old messages to write new ones. For new messages, create a new message. Regards, Rony. -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
