On Tuesday 15 Mar 2011, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 21:00 +0530, Rony wrote: > > > would censorship be the correct term? > > > > To some extent, only to ensure that disturbing messages do not make > > it > > to everyone's inbox again. > > and who will censor the censor? we do not know which messages he is > rejecting - suppose he errs in his judgment?
Just go to another list -- no one is forcing you to remain here if you don't trust the list administrators. Or start your own list with your own rules. No one's stopping you from doing that either. Now let's have another 50 meaningful messages about some inconsequential response to some inconsequential spam. Just because it's done that way the world over doesn't mean it's good enough for our list members -- oh no, we have to dissect each atom and examine each quark until we can extract the last amount of meaning and entertainment from it. Otherwise how do we get our money's worth from the list? Request to list moderator goose-stepping nazi banana republic cannibalistic dictator types: please put everyone who's contributed to this thread (including me) immediately on moderation. Regards, -- Raj -- Raj Mathur [email protected] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
