2011/2/2 Nitesh Mistry <[email protected]>: > Didn't I write "USUALLY"? But what you say about backend processing is
Well, I did ask you for one of these "usual" signature examples where a signature authentication is not required. > the messages with pgp keys is more meaningful than you just writing your > name below every message. Because anybody can write any name below the > message, but nobody other than me can pgp sign a message with key id > A6FEF696. If you want a proof that the name mentioned on the key A6FEF696 > is really Nitesh Mistry, you are always welcome to meet me and I can give > all the documents in the world to prove it (and no I won't bite you ;) ). The point from day one is that it carries no additional meaning in a mailing list context; all you are doing is reducing the S/N. If you cannot grasp that, why bother? In any case, I don't want to continue this argument any further as I mentioned in the previous mail. I do understand how a geek code or a pgp signature add to someone's geekness (irrespective of whether they are contextually appropriate or not). So carry on. Binand -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
