On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 04:11:14PM +0530, steve wrote: > Hi, > > In context of a couple of mails I sent earlier this week, including the one > about GNOME contributions by a certain distro, I thought yesterday's blog > post > by Mark Shuttleworth is interesting. More interesting are the responses he > gets: > > http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/439 > > This of course, was in response to GergDeK's(*) post: > > http://gregdekspeaks.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/red-hat-16-canonical-1/ > > Of course, having to defend oneself by words rather than work in meritocracy > based FOSS is ...ahem ...sad. Read all the comments to get a fair idea.
I read the editor's note on Linux Today [0], and it is spot on. [0] http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2010-07-30-028-35-OS-CY-UB I was always proud of the Ubuntu Community for being 'relentlessly positive' and the Mark's response has given me one more reason to be proud of it. -- Regards, Nitesh Mistry www.mistrynitesh.com -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GB/J/IT/O>TW d+(-) s+:+>: a- C+ UL>+++ P L++>+++ !E W++ N* o? K? w--- O? M-- V? PS+() PE(++)(-) Y+ PGP+ t 5? X R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++>++++ h-- !r y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
