On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:00:32PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 28.07.2017 01:32, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:46:07PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> All of these Tegra SoC generations have a ChipIdea UDC IP block that can
> >> be used for device mode communication with a host. Implement rudimentary
> >> support that doesn't allow switching between host and device modes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> >> [dig...@gmail.com: rebased patches and added DMA alignment quirk for
> >> Tegra20]
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
> >> Acked-by: Peter Chen <peter.c...@nxp.com>
> >
> > This works on my Asus TF300T (Tegra3 device). Minor nit below.
> >
> > Tested-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl> (on tf300t)
> >
>
> Nice, thank you!
>
> > [...]
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..7814500e71fa
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_tegra.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> > [...]
> >> +struct tegra_udc_soc_info {
> >> + bool supports_unaligned_dma;
> >> +};
> > [...]
> >> +static const struct tegra_udc_soc_info tegra20_udc_soc_info = {
> >> + .supports_unaligned_dma = false,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct tegra_udc_soc_info tegra30_udc_soc_info = {
> >> + .supports_unaligned_dma = true,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct tegra_udc_soc_info tegra114_udc_soc_info = {
> >> + .supports_unaligned_dma = true,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct tegra_udc_soc_info tegra124_udc_soc_info = {
> >> + .supports_unaligned_dma = true,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct of_device_id tegra_udc_of_match[] = {
> >> + {
> >> + .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-udc",
> >> + .data = &tegra20_udc_soc_info,
> >> + }, {
> >> + .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-udc",
> >> + .data = &tegra30_udc_soc_info,
> >> + }, {
> >> + .compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-udc",
> >> + .data = &tegra114_udc_soc_info,
> >> + }, {
> >> + .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-udc",
> >> + .data = &tegra124_udc_soc_info,
> >> + }, {
> >> + /* sentinel */
> >> + }
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra_udc_of_match);
> > [...]
> >> +static int tegra_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{
> > [...]
> >> + /* setup device specific quirks */
> >> + soc = id->data;
> >> +
> >> + if (!soc->supports_unaligned_dma)
> >> + udc->data.flags |= CI_HDRC_REQUIRES_ALIGNED_DMA;
> > [...]
> >
> > Some lines would be saved if this was just:
> >
> > udc->data.flags |= id->data;
> >
>
> I think a verbose approach is more preferable and it also more future proof
> since we may extend soc_info with other stuff later.
I would just leave that to be done when it's needed. :-)
Or you could just have udc_flags in struct tegra_udc_soc_info, so
that it would not need to be translated - again saving code, bugs
and future developers' time.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
