On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:27:04AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
> 
> Some LEDs can be related to a specific device(s) described in the DT.
> This property allows specifying such relations. E.g. USB LED should
> usually be used to indicate some USB port(s) state.
> 
> Please note this binding is designed to be generic and not influenced by
> any operating system design. Linux developers may find "trigger" part a
> bit confusing since in Linux triggers are separated drivers. It
> shouldn't define the binding though (we shouldn't add an extra level of
> indirection).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
> ---
> V2: Replace "usb-ports" with "led-triggers" property which is more generic and
>     allows specifying other devices as well.
> V3: Use "trigger-sources" which is even more accurate as devices aren't
>     precisely triggers.
> V4: Update example to use the correct property
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
> index 24b656014089..7efaa2cff624 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
> @@ -49,6 +49,19 @@ Optional properties for child nodes:
>  - panic-indicator : This property specifies that the LED should be used,
>                   if at all possible, as a panic indicator.
>  
> +- trigger-sources : List of devices which should be used as a source 
> triggering
> +                 this LED activity. Some LEDs can be related to a specific
> +                 device and should somehow indicate its state. E.g. USB 2.0
> +                 LED may react to device(s) in a USB 2.0 port(s).
> +                 Another common example is switch or router with multiple
> +                 Ethernet ports each of them having its own LED assigned
> +                 (assuming they are not hardwired). In such cases this
> +                 property should contain phandle(s) of related source
> +                 device(s).
> +                 In many cases LED can be related to more than one device
> +                 (e.g. one USB LED vs. multiple USB ports) so a list of
> +                 sources can be specified.
> +

Where's #source-cells documented?

I really prefer if we have consistency in naming with "<prop>s" and 
"#<prop>-cells". #source-cells is also not very clear what it is for. 

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to