* Bin Liu <b-...@ti.com> [170512 10:43]: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:21:35AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Bin Liu <b-...@ti.com> [170512 08:24]: > > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:58:49AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > OK. No better ideas except I think we should probably have a separate > > > > timer for keeping VBUS on after state changes eventually. > > > > > > Currently with the patch below, VBUS is constantly on for host-only > > > mode, and this is what we want. Why we need a separate timer? No one > > > cuts VBUs now for host-only mode. > > > > Oh I was just thinking what we might want to do in the future if > > we want to cut off VBUS when no devices are connected. If we have > > Okay, I see. But I don't think we will ever want to turn off VBUS when > no devices attached for host-only mode. Any other controllers do this? > > Turning off VBUS doesn't save us much, because it comes from an external > power rail, and no one consumes it when no devices are attached. > > I believe keeping the controller idle as what we have now is sufficient.
OK fine with me. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
