Hi,

Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> writes:
> On 15/02/17 13:44, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> writes:
>>> To avoid checkpatch warnings with new patches let's
>>> start using the BIT() macro wherever possible.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h      | 192 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c |  48 +++++------
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h    |  20 ++---
>>>  3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>> index 14b7602..d514dca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
>>>  #define DWC3_DEVICE_EVENT_OVERFLOW         11
>>>  
>>>  #define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_MASK       0xfffc
>>> -#define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_EHB        (1 << 31)
>>> +#define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_EHB        BIT(31)
>> 
>> don't you need to include <linux/bitops.h> for this?
>> 
>
> I didn't get any build errors though.

indirect inclusion. Problems will show up only when headers are moved
around ;-)

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to