On 12/09/2016 05:04 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com> [161209 14:46]: >> >> >> On 12/09/2016 03:59 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com> [161209 12:55]: >>>> Switch back from devm_request_threaded_irq() to request_threaded_irq() to >>>> avoid races between interrupt handler execution and PM runtime in error >>>> handling code path in probe and in dwc3_omap_remove(): >>> >>> Can't you just call disable_irq() on the exit path instead of removing >>> devm? >>> >> >> I can. But what will be the benefit from using devm then? > > Hmm good point. Probably the least number of code would be to just > do NOAUTOEN before devm_request_irq(), then only do enable_irq() > just before returning from the probe. After all, we don't really > want the irq running until the probe is done. > > I think that would leave out the extra handling from the error > path? >
Good question here is - do we need this irq to be enabled for sub-device probing from of_platform_populate()? ;) -- regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
