> Ok, I'm going to be really pedantic here and ask that you spell this
> last statement out:
> if (usb...)
> return true;
> return false;
>
> Also, the comment should say:
> /* If the first endpoint is not interrupt IN, we... */
>
It's better to inverse the condition and return false:
```
if (!usb...)
return false;
return true;
```
This is exactly what is said in the comment ("If the first endpoint...
we'd better punt!"). And does not break the composition of the entire
function (all `if` bodies return false, last statement is `return
true`).
--
Eugene
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
