On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:20:18PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter Chen <hzpeterc...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 03:33:30PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> >> skb is checked for null pointer at above code, so skb might be null.
> >> eem_wrap uses it without checking null pointer, fix it by adding null
> >> pointer check.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.c...@nxp.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
> >> b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
> >> index 5f562c1..2bc8823 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c
> >> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t eth_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >>
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
> >> - if (dev->port_usb)
> >> + if (dev->port_usb && skb)
> >> skb = dev->wrap(dev->port_usb, skb);
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
> >> if (!skb) {
> >> --
> >
> > Felipe, please do not queue this patch, it will break the ncm function
> > which the socket buffer may be NULL.
> >
> > If you are ok with below changes, I will submit patch:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_eem.c
> > b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_eem.c
> > index d58bfc3..5e0db68 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_eem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_eem.c
> > @@ -341,11 +341,15 @@ static struct sk_buff *eem_wrap(struct gether *port,
> > struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > struct sk_buff *skb2 = NULL;
> > struct usb_ep *in = port->in_ep;
> > - int padlen = 0;
> > + int headroom, tailroom, padlen = 0;
> > u16 len = skb->len;
> >
> > - int headroom = skb_headroom(skb);
> > - int tailroom = skb_tailroom(skb);
> > + if (!skb)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + len = skb->len;
> > + headroom = skb_headroom(skb);
> > + tailroom = skb_tailroom(skb);
> >
> > /* When (len + EEM_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN) % in->maxpacket) is 0,
> > * stick two bytes of zero-length EEM packet on the end.
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_rndis.c
> > b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_rndis.c
> > index c800582..16562e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_rndis.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_rndis.c
> > @@ -374,6 +374,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *rndis_add_header(struct gether
> > *port,
> > {
> > struct sk_buff *skb2;
> >
> > + if (!skb)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > skb2 = skb_realloc_headroom(skb, sizeof(struct rndis_packet_msg_type));
> > rndis_add_hdr(skb2);
> >
>
> looks okay to me. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 are still fine, right?
>
Yes, I will send v2 and appended these two.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
