On 14/06/16 12:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 3:04:27 AM CEST kbuild test robot wrote:
>>>> drivers/usb/core/of.c:32:21: error: redefinition of 'usb_of_get_child_node'
>> struct device_node *usb_of_get_child_node(struct device_node *parent,
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> In file included from drivers/usb/core/of.c:21:0:
>> include/linux/usb/of.h:36:35: note: previous definition of
>> 'usb_of_get_child_node' was here
>> static inline struct device_node *usb_of_get_child_node
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> vim +/usb_of_get_child_node +32 drivers/usb/core/of.c
>>
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 26 * @portnum: the port number which
>> device is connecting
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 27 *
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 28 * Find the node from device tree
>> according to its port number.
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 29 *
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 30 * Return: On success, a pointer to the
>> device node, %NULL on failure.
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 31 */
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 @32 struct device_node
>> *usb_of_get_child_node(struct device_node *parent,
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 33 int
>> portnum)
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 34 {
>> 69bec725 Peter Chen 2016-02-19 35 struct device_node *node;
>>
>>
>
> I think what we want here is to make the compilation of of.o conditional on
> CONFIG_OF, so we get only one of the two definitions.
Ah, so make the of.o conditional, and also apply my patch for when
it is compiled.
Should I submit one for that, or is someone else on the case?
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
