On Thu, 19 May 2016, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> UBSAN throws a complaint:
>
> [ 2.418579] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c:877:47
> [ 2.418582] index -1 is out of range for type 'u32 [1]'
>
> though it's only on the hostpc[] part, not on the port_status[] on the
> previous line which has the same exact index calculation. The root cause is
> that the first declaration is port_status[0], which uses a GCC extension and
> UBSAN is smart enough to realize the programmer is doing something
> intentionally odd.
>
> However, the problematic declaration is hostpc[1], which doesn't have
> the "I know what I'm doing" semantics of [0]. Change the declaration to
> match.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>
>
> --- a/include/linux/usb/ehci_def.h 2015-01-06 01:04:24.342436706 -0500
> +++ b/include/linux/usb/ehci_def.h 2016-05-19 13:57:20.869304540 -0400
> @@ -180,11 +180,11 @@ struct ehci_regs {
> * PORTSCx
> */
> /* HOSTPC: offset 0x84 */
> - u32 hostpc[1]; /* HOSTPC extension */
> + u32 hostpc[0]; /* HOSTPC extension */
> #define HOSTPC_PHCD (1<<22) /* Phy clock disable */
> #define HOSTPC_PSPD (3<<25) /* Port speed detection */
>
> - u32 reserved5[16];
> + u32 reserved5[17];
>
> /* USBMODE_EX: offset 0xc8 */
> u32 usbmode_ex; /* USB Device mode extension */
Is this problem still present with my latest patch
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=146368979514228&w=2)?
I agree that this is a reasonable change to make in any case.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
