Hello.
On 5/12/2016 11:48 AM, Mathieu OTHACEHE wrote:
Inline functions are preferable to macros resembling functions.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu OTHACEHE <m.othac...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c
b/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c
index 6002e8b..2fc3ea1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c
@@ -248,8 +248,16 @@ struct ti_interrupt {
} __packed;
/* Interrupt codes */
-#define TI_GET_PORT_FROM_CODE(c) (((c) >> 4) - 3)
-#define TI_GET_FUNC_FROM_CODE(c) ((c) & 0x0f)
+static inline int ti_get_port_from_code(unsigned char code)
+{
+ return (code >> 4) - 3;
+}
+
+static inline int ti_get_func_from_code(unsigned char code)
+{
+ return code & 0x0f;
+}
+
We don't specify *inline* in the .c files (only in .h), letting gcc figure
it out.
[...]
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
