On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:

> I was proposing something like the attached.
> When you have an oppurtunity to fix or be complaint let us use that so.
> 
> I finally leave this here for you to accept or reject.

It's hard to comment on attachments.  You should put your patches in 
the body of the email.

Here's your patch:

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
index ffc9029..8e7e4a7 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
@@ -872,9 +872,8 @@ int ehci_hub_control(
 ) {
        struct ehci_hcd *ehci = hcd_to_ehci (hcd);
        int             ports = HCS_N_PORTS (ehci->hcs_params);
-       u32 __iomem     *status_reg = &ehci->regs->port_status[
-                               (wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
-       u32 __iomem     *hostpc_reg = &ehci->regs->hostpc[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
+       u32 __iomem     *status_reg = NULL;
+       u32 __iomem     *hostpc_reg = NULL;
        u32             temp, temp1, status;
        unsigned long   flags;
        int             retval = 0;
@@ -902,6 +901,9 @@ int ehci_hub_control(
        case ClearPortFeature:
                if (!wIndex || wIndex > ports)
                        goto error;
+
+               status_reg = &ehci->regs->port_status[ (wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
+               hostpc_reg = &ehci->regs->hostpc[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
                wIndex--;
                temp = ehci_readl(ehci, status_reg);
                temp &= ~PORT_RWC_BITS;
@@ -990,6 +992,8 @@ int ehci_hub_control(
        case GetPortStatus:
                if (!wIndex || wIndex > ports)
                        goto error;
+               status_reg = &ehci->regs->port_status[ (wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
+               hostpc_reg = &ehci->regs->hostpc[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
                wIndex--;
                status = 0;
                temp = ehci_readl(ehci, status_reg);
@@ -1159,6 +1163,8 @@ int ehci_hub_control(
                }
                if (!wIndex || wIndex > ports)
                        goto error;
+               status_reg = &ehci->regs->port_status[ (wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
+               hostpc_reg = &ehci->regs->hostpc[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
                wIndex--;
                temp = ehci_readl(ehci, status_reg);
                if (temp & PORT_OWNER)

You want to replace 2 statements with 8 statements that do exactly 
the same thing?  This does not seem like an improvement.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to