On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:21:59AM +0000, fx IWATA NOBUO wrote: > > I don't see any benifit here at all, please explain it better. > > You are saying what your patch does, but not why we would want it. > > It may not be better than cover letter but I try. > > My use case is > a) a service in internet with VHCI > b) distributed small Linux nodes with STUB and IoT devices. > > IoT device may be inside firewall. > To pass firewall, usually WebSocket is used. > It can be added tunneling daemon in both side. > Connection must be initiated from device side. > This is the most important for my use case. > > In the use case, there may be no operator checking device. > Device may be plug-and-played. > > For security consideration, client verification be the tunneling > daemon.
Why isn't this in the changelog itself? But more importantly, I don't see how this patch makes your "goal" implemented... Anyway, please break this all up into smaller, logical, easier to review, patches and we can take it from there. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
