Hi, Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de> writes: >> it would've been nicer if you could add an erratum ID number for >> future reference together with a more verbose discussion of the >> problem. You're not describing what the problem is and that's >> important. > > I do not have access to the documentation for this SOC, I hope the > people from Broadcom with access to such documentation can help out > here.
oh, that's a shame. Yeah, let's hope broadcom can give more details about the need for this erratum workaround. thanks -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
