On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 10:41 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > A recent patch, 7fa40910e0bf5ef32eca49595d950cb24f6402bf, added a
> > CONNECTED retry for a different reason and I could simply increase
> > this retry time. Any thoughts?
>
> I don't know. You've got a non-compliant host combined with an
> excessively slow device. It seems unwise to penalize everybody by
> slowing down their resumes (by 500 ms!) just because of this one
> bad combination.
>
> On the other hand, I don't have any better ideas.
Yet another quirk. Assume this to be necessary only if the port
was connected to a quirky device before loss of power.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
