By the way QNAP NAS systems are shipped with a 64bit kernel but a 32bit system environment. Those systems support USB 2.0 and USB 3.0.
You can expect any kind of combination out there. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> wrote: > "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunder...@bigfoot.com> writes: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 03:16:55PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >>> xHCI always uses 64-bit addresses. But many EHCI controllers don't, >>> and only a few of the EHCI platform drivers support 64-bit DMA. >> >> OK, sure. But are systems with USB2 only and more than 4GB of RAM common? > > Hmpff. They are common in my house at least :) > > bjorn@nemi:~$ lspci -nn|grep USB > 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 03) > 00:1a.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 03) > 00:1a.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #6 [8086:2939] (rev 03) > 00:1a.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 > EHCI Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 03) > 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #1 [8086:2934] (rev 03) > 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #2 [8086:2935] (rev 03) > 00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #3 [8086:2936] (rev 03) > 00:1d.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 > EHCI Controller #1 [8086:293a] (rev 03) > bjorn@nemi:~$ grep MemTotal /proc/meminfo > MemTotal: 8051536 kB > > bjorn@canardo:~$ lspci -nn|grep USB > 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #4 [8086:2937] (rev 02) > 00:1a.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #5 [8086:2938] (rev 02) > 00:1a.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #6 [8086:2939] (rev 02) > 00:1a.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 > EHCI Controller #2 [8086:293c] (rev 02) > 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #1 [8086:2934] (rev 02) > 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #2 [8086:2935] (rev 02) > 00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB > UHCI Controller #3 [8086:2936] (rev 02) > 00:1d.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 > EHCI Controller #1 [8086:293a] (rev 02) > bjorn@canardo:~$ grep MemTotal /proc/meminfo > MemTotal: 8195224 kB > > Most systems of that generation can take 8GB RAM, and there isn't really > any reason not to max that out, is there? > >> (And will they not increasingly die out, if nothing else as USB3 becomes >> commonplace?) > > Can you wait 10 years for that to happen, or do you want a solution > earlier? > > > Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
