Hi,

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:54:13 -0500
Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:48:28PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrj舁\xE7<ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > This reverts commit 8f2c9544aba636134303105ecb164190a39dece4.
> > 
> > As it breaks g_ether on my Baytrail FFRD8 device. Everything starts out
> > fine, but after a bit of data has been transferred it just stops
> > flowing.
> > 
> > Note that I do get a bunch of these "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08"
> > when booting the machine, but I'm not really sure if they're related
> > to this problem.
> 
> I have a feeling your problem is elsewhere. We *are* completing one TRB
> at a time. 

If usb_request.no_interrupt is flagged, it seems dwc3 does not set IOC
on the corresponding TRB.  Does it break the assumption every TRB
(without SG) will trigger one corresponding EP event?
u_ether is the function module that utilizes 'no_interrupt' flag.

-- 
Masakazu Mokuno

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to