I have never seen any bcma device with an USB host core which was not a
SoC, the bcma devices have an USB device core with a different core id.
Some SoC have IDs with 47XX and 53XX in decimal form which would be
rejected by this check. Instead of fixing this check just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de>
---
drivers/usb/host/bcma-hcd.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/bcma-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/bcma-hcd.c
index 526cfab..976b4e1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/bcma-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/bcma-hcd.c
@@ -214,16 +214,11 @@ err_alloc:
static int bcma_hcd_probe(struct bcma_device *dev)
{
int err;
- u16 chipid_top;
u32 ohci_addr;
struct bcma_hcd_device *usb_dev;
struct bcma_chipinfo *chipinfo;
chipinfo = &dev->bus->chipinfo;
- /* USBcores are only connected on embedded devices. */
- chipid_top = (chipinfo->id & 0xFF00);
- if (chipid_top != 0x4700 && chipid_top != 0x5300)
- return -ENODEV;
/* TODO: Probably need checks here; is the core connected? */
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
