On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 12:51 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
> > Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
> > on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor.
> 
> From Documentation/printk-formats.txt:
> 
>     "On ia64, ppc64 and parisc64 architectures function pointers are
>     actually function descriptors which must first be resolved. The 'F' and
>     'f' specifiers perform this resolution and then provide the same
>     functionality as the 'S' and 's' specifiers."
> 
> ,so current code should work fine on ppc64, right?

No.  __builtin_return_address() returns a pointer to an instruction, not
a function pointer descriptor.  If you use %pF on the former, it'll
print instruction opcodes as if they were the address.

-Scott


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to