Le 23/01/2015 08:43, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
> 
>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.roc...@finsecur.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Vbus IRQ handler needs a started UDC driver to work because it uses
>> udc->driver, which is set by the UDC start handler. The previous way
>> chosen was to return from interrupt if udc->driver is NULL using a
>> spinlock around the check.
>>
>> We now request an auto disabled (IRQ_NOAUTOEN) Vbus signal IRQ instead
>> of an auto enabled IRQ followed by disable_irq(). This way we remove the
>> very small timeslot of enabled IRQ which existed previously between
>> request() and disable(). We don't need anymore to check if udc->driver
>> is NULL in IRQ handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.roc...@finsecur.com>
>> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
>> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 9 ++-------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c 
>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>> index 40e5fc7..f9f305f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>> @@ -1745,10 +1745,6 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_vbus_irq(int irq, void *devid)
>>
>>      spin_lock(&udc->lock);
>>
>> -    /* May happen if Vbus pin toggles during probe() */
>> -    if (!udc->driver)
>> -            goto out;
>> -
>>      vbus = vbus_is_present(udc);
>>      if (vbus != udc->vbus_prev) {
>>              if (vbus) {
>> @@ -1769,7 +1765,6 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_vbus_irq(int irq, void *devid)
>>              udc->vbus_prev = vbus;
>>      }
>>
>> -out:
>>      spin_unlock(&udc->lock);
>>
>>      return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> @@ -2109,6 +2104,8 @@ static int usba_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>      if (gpio_is_valid(udc->vbus_pin)) {
>>              if (!devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, udc->vbus_pin, 
>> "atmel_usba_udc")) {
>> +                    irq_set_status_flags(gpio_to_irq(udc->vbus_pin),
>> +                                    IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> 
> not happy about still using the broken gpio_to_irq API
> 
> Linus can pass the IRQ via board file?
> 
> and via DT we can use IRQ directly

Absolutely not the topic of this patch series.
Maybe the subject of another patch later?

Best regards,


>>                      ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
>>                                      gpio_to_irq(udc->vbus_pin),
>>                                      usba_vbus_irq, 0,
>> @@ -2118,8 +2115,6 @@ static int usba_udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                              dev_warn(&udc->pdev->dev,
>>                                       "failed to request vbus irq; "
>>                                       "assuming always on\n");
>> -                    } else {
>> -                            disable_irq(gpio_to_irq(udc->vbus_pin));
>>                      }
>>              } else {
>>                      /* gpio_request fail so use -EINVAL for gpio_is_valid */
>> -- 
>> 2.1.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to