On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 10:13 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.de> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 17:52 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> >> Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.de> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I think I found a race between pre_reset() and the bottom half.
> >> > In wdm_rxwork() WDM_RESETTING is not checked for. That means that
> >> >
> >> > wdm_pre_reset() cannot reliable end IO. What do you think?
> >>
> >> Yes, it certainly looks that way. There are too many flags meaning
> >> "end IO"...
> >
> > So you think I should consolidate the flags rather add a check?
>
> If possible. At least that was my initial thought after a quick look.
> But I don't know how feasible it is. I can imagine that we might need
> to separate the flags we want to clear. At least the ones that can be
> set at the same time, if any.
At a closer look it looks to me that this is not easily doable,
as the error returns and the response to poll() must be different.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
