On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:12:09AM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:01:17AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:44:54AM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:

> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h 
> > > b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
> > > index 5937b2d..be3fffe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
> > > @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@
> > >  #define XSENS_VID                0x2639
> > >  #define XSENS_CONVERTER_PID      0xD00D  /* Xsens USB-serial converter */
> > >  #define XSENS_MTW_PID            0x0200  /* Xsens MTw */
> > > +#define XSENS_AWINDA_STATION_PID 0x0101
> > > +#define XSENS_AWINDA_DONGLE_PID 0x0102
> > 
> > And sorted by PID here (even though the two current entries are not, you
> > could reorder them as well).
> > 
> > I noticed that the below PIDs use the FTDI VID. Perhaps a comment or at
> > least a separating empty line would be appropriate.
> > 
> > >  #define XSENS_CONVERTER_0_PID    0xD388  /* Xsens USB converter */
> > >  #define XSENS_CONVERTER_1_PID    0xD389  /* Xsens Wireless Receiver */
> > >  #define XSENS_CONVERTER_2_PID    0xD38A
> 
> I'll move the new entries up. How about I throw in a separate patch that
> cleans up stuff around the PID definitions? There's some alignment off
> as well. That doesn't need to go into stable, I think.

As long as you keep the clean up minimal (e.g. the reorder the two
entries above and add a comment or new line, skip the alignment bit) it
can all go in one patch along with the new PIDs.

That way there'll be no conflicts when future PID-patches get backported
to stable.

Thanks,
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to