Hi, On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:31:32AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > This reverts commit f2267089ea17fa97b796b1b4247e3f8957655df3. > > That commit causes more problem than fixes. Firstly, kfree() > should be called after usb_ep_dequeue() and secondly, the way > things are, we will try to dequeue a request that has already > completed much more frequently than one which is pending. > > Cc: Li Jun <b47...@freescale.com> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> > --- > > Greg, can you still apply this for v3.17 final ? Please take it as a patch > directly so we avoid a pull request for a single patch. If you prefer a pull, > let me know.
looks like -rc6 will be the last -rc for v3.17. If we can't get this on
v3.17-final, do you mind merging this on usb-next and add a Cc stable
#3.17 ?
leaving patch below for reference only.
> Li Jun, a proper change to guarantee there will be no pending requests when we
> unload a composite gadget driver needs to be more involved. I'll send patches
> (which I plan on adding to v3.19 only) shortly. Please give me your Tested-by
> once I send such patches.
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> index 6935a82..f801519 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> @@ -1956,7 +1956,6 @@ void composite_dev_cleanup(struct usb_composite_dev
> *cdev)
> }
> if (cdev->req) {
> kfree(cdev->req->buf);
> - usb_ep_dequeue(cdev->gadget->ep0, cdev->req);
> usb_ep_free_request(cdev->gadget->ep0, cdev->req);
> }
> cdev->next_string_id = 0;
> --
> 2.1.0.243.g30d45f7
>
--
balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
