On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mailbox/tegra-xusb-mailbox.h >> b/include/dt-bindings/mailbox/tegra-xusb-mailbox.h > > >> +#define TEGRA_XUSB_MBOX_CHAN_HOST 0 >> +#define TEGRA_XUSB_MBOX_CHAN_PHY 1 > > > I can't work out how these values relate to hardware at all. Are they in > fact properties of the particular firmware that's loaded into the XUSB > module? If so, I don't think the DT should contain these values at all.
Yes this is rather ugly... they're used by software for the demuxing of messages and don't correspond to actual hardware. > I wonder if the individual MBOX_CMD_* values from patch 2 are any > better, although I think those are also defined by the firmware, not the > hardware? They are indeed defined by the firmware, so this would become an issue if the firmware API ever changed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
