Hello, I read the USB spec, understand when to prefer bulk vs. isochronous pipes. My usecase requires controlled jitter & guaranteed bandwidth. But when discussing this with multiple peer engineers, rumor goes isochronous mode has 'issues' (sic), they advise me against using it altogether.
But when I try to pinpoint, I find nothing: 'isochronous' does not require more patches on this mailing list or in the git history; no panic stories on forums; commercial devices are few but do exist. Does the Linux USB implementation supports both equally well? And also the scheduling of a mixture of both pipe types? For both USB 2 and 3? Do you have an idea why many commercial devices (e.g. AV applications) still would go for bulk? Thanks a lot & kind regards, Yves -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
