Hi Alan,

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > @@ -206,6 +208,19 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *dev)
> >                             break;
> >                     }
> >             }
> > +
> > +           priv->rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&dev->dev,
> > +                                                       NULL);
> 
> I hate the style that matches arguments on a continuation line with the
> opening paren of the function call, for a couple of reasons.  Instead I
> simply indent continuation lines by two or more tab stops.  But some
> people seem to be incurably attached to it.

Ok, I'll change it.

> > +           if (IS_ERR(priv->rst)) {
> > +                   err = PTR_ERR(priv->rst);
> > +                   if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +                           goto err_put_clks;
> > +                   priv->rst = NULL;
> > +           } else {
> > +                   err = reset_control_deassert(priv->rst);
> > +                   if (err)
> > +                           goto err_put_clks;
> > +           }
> >     }
> >  
> >     if (pdata->big_endian_desc)
> 
> The new code was added inside an "if" statement, which will cause it to
> apply only to OF devices.  Is there any reason not to put the new code
> outside the "if" statement, so it applies to all devices?

Hmmm, I did this because so far, the reset framework only handles the
DT case. But that's right that it can be extended in the future, I'll
update it.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to