Hi, On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 09:55:25PM -0600, David Mosberger wrote: > Felipe, > > Thanks for your feedback, I'll take that into consideration. > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: > > >> + max3421_hcd->spi_thread = kthread_run(max3421_spi_thread, hcd, > >> + "max3421_spi_thread"); > > > > why do you need this kthread ? For IRQ handling ? use threaded IRQs > > instead. > > Is there a clean way to wakeup a threaded IRQ handler without an > interrupt? Unless I'm missing something, there is not. I started out > with a threaded handler in fact, but there are other reasons (e.g., > URB enqueue) which need to wake up the thread.
Why do you need to run your IRQ handler when an URQ gets enqueued ? That doesn't make much sense :-s -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
