Hi,
On 03/20/2014 02:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 20 March 2014 07:52 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/19/2014 09:08 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 18 March 2014 05:34 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> This patch remove unnecessary function call in of_extcon_get_extcon_dev()
>>>> by using the name of device_node structure.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c | 12 ++----------
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c
>>>> index 72173ec..0a29f82 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/of_extcon.c
>>>> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct extcon_dev *of_extcon_get_extcon_dev(struct
>>>> device *dev, int index)
>>>> {
>>>> struct device_node *node;
>>>> struct extcon_dev *edev;
>>>> - struct platform_device *extcon_parent_dev;
>>>>
>>>> if (!dev->of_node) {
>>>> dev_dbg(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
>>>> @@ -46,16 +45,9 @@ struct extcon_dev *of_extcon_get_extcon_dev(struct
>>>> device *dev, int index)
>>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - extcon_parent_dev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
>>>> - if (!extcon_parent_dev) {
>>>> - dev_dbg(dev, "unable to find device by node\n");
>>>> - return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> - edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev(dev_name(&extcon_parent_dev->dev));
>>>> + edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev(node->name);
>>>
>>> Since you no longer want to use device names I think you should add this
>>> too to
>>> warn users if they rely on using the device name.
>>
>> Previous of_extcon_get_extcon_dev() support only platform device using
>> of_find_device_by_node.
>>
>> If extcon device is based on i2c/spi/pci and so on,
>> of_extcon_get_extcon_dev() can't
>> find device instance for device name. So, I change device name from the name
>> of platform device
>> to the name of dt node.
>
> That's fine. But we have to fix extcon_dev_register() too, to not use device
> names right? We have to warn extcon users not to use device names right?
I don't think so. extcon_get_edev_by_phandle() shows wrong node->name as
following:
The consumer could detect the cause of problem which can't get extcon device
after
checking error log message.
edev = extcon_get_extcon_dev(node->name);
if (!edev) {
dev_err(dev, "unable to get extcon device : %s\n", node->name);
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
I don't want to add more log message.
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
>>> index bc4c789..025eb39 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
>>> @@ -601,7 +601,6 @@ int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>>> edev->dev.class = extcon_class;
>>> edev->dev.release = extcon_dev_release;
>>>
>>> - edev->name = edev->name ? edev->name : dev_name(edev->dev.parent);
>>> //The user should always pass the 'name' as we no longer use device name
>>> while
>>> getting extcon device. And this name should also be the 'node' name?
>>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(edev->name)) {
>>> dev_err(&edev->dev,
>>> "extcon device name is null\n");
>>>
>>> Btw changing to node name from device name breaks dwc3 in OMAP5 and you
>>> would
>>> need this too..
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>> index 2aea4bc..cea8cd3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>
>>> palmas_usb->edev.supported_cable = palmas_extcon_cable;
>>> palmas_usb->edev.dev.parent = palmas_usb->dev;
>>> + palmas_usb->edev.name = "palmas_usb";
>>> palmas_usb->edev.mutually_exclusive = mutually_exclusive;
>>>
>>> status = extcon_dev_register(&palmas_usb->edev);
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Kishon
>>>
>>
>> If node name is same as extcon device name, don't need some modification.
>> Also, you can modify node name in some OMAP dts file insead of modification
>> of extcon-palmas.c
>
> node name in OMAP dts is already 'palmas_usb'. But since we were not setting
> 'edev.name' in extcon-palmas.c, extcon_dev_register used device name of palmas
> (palmas_usb.7 in my case). So extcon-palmas.c needs the fix.
For example,
I used extcon provider/consumer driver in dts as following:
extcon-max14577.c set device name as edev->name and then dt node name of
max14577
set "max14577-muic" which is same as device name(dev_name(&pdev->dev)).
I don't need to modify extcon-max14577.c
In drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
...
info->edev->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
...
In dts.
i2c@13880000 {
.....
max14577@25 {
.....
muic: max14577-muic {
compatible = "maxim,max14577-muic";
};
....
};
};
hsotg@12480000 {
.....
extcon = <&muic>;
};
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
