Пятница, 7 марта 2014, 18:04 +01:00 от Denis Carikli <de...@eukrea.com>:
> Signed-off-by: Denis Carikli <de...@eukrea.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c | 59
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c
> b/drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c
> index cd061ab..d956ad0 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/usbmisc_imx.c
...
> + val = readl(usbmisc->base);
> + val &= ~(MX25_OTG_SIC_MASK | MX25_OTG_PP_BIT);
> + val |= (MXC_EHCI_INTERFACE_DIFF_UNI & MXC_EHCI_INTERFACE_MASK)
> << MX25_OTG_SIC_SHIFT;
> + val |= (MX25_OTG_PM_BIT | MX25_OTG_OCPOL_BIT);
> + writel(val, usbmisc->base);
At the moment, we only enable/disable interface and manage overcurrent option
in the usbmisc driver.
Is it worth it to handle type of interface here?
---
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{������^n�r���z���h�����&�� �G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m������z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�
